35 pages 1 hour read

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

Dear Ijeawele, or a Feminist Manifesto in Fifteen Suggestions

Nonfiction | Essay / Speech | Adult | Published in 2017

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Early Conditioning into Gender Roles

For Adichie, the problem of gender inequality begins at birth. Yet, it’s not because boys and girls are born unequal—they’re not—it’s because almost from the moment babies are born, they begin to be conditioned into different forms by the people around them.

This is the unspoken premise of the book: The root cause of gender inequality in society is the disparity in the way we raise girls and boys. Unequal conditioning as children leads to unequal outcomes as adults. That puts an incredible onus on parents to engender feminist change.

Many of the suggestions in this book are simply about being aware of the way that we train girls and boys differently so that we can redress the problem. For example, suggestion 7 is about how girls are taught to be preoccupied with marriage, whereas boys are not. Suggestion 8 discusses the way girls are taught to be restrained, mild-mannered, and obedient, while boys are taught to be honest and to express themselves. Suggestion 12 is about the ways in which we condition girls to find sex shameful, while boys are taught to take pride in their sexual conquests.

Again, the problem is not simply that girls and boys are raised to be different. The problem is that the unequal way we condition children often leads to negative—even devastating—outcomes for women in later life. The fact that women are conditioned to value marriage more than men means women are more likely to give up their personal ambitions to make a relationship work. The way we condition girls to be passive and obedient makes them more vulnerable to sexual assault. Furthermore, the way we condition girls to find sex shameful complicates and sours sexual pleasure for women.

For feminists, the way we raise girls matters. The fact that we treat them differently than boys is not an inevitable consequence of biology—it’s a choice, and one that results from our own conditioning by society. We have the choice to raise our children another way—as equals.

Double Standards for Men and Women

Throughout the book, Adichie offers numerous real-world examples to support her case that society enforces a basic inequality between men and women. When you boil them down, a lot of these examples follow the same formula; they aim to demonstrate a double standard. A double standard refers to a situation in which a standard of behavior is unfairly applied to one group of people but not to others. In the context of feminism, the argument is that, in various situations, our culture unfairly applies a higher standard to women than to men, and this has negative outcomes for women.

A classic example of a double standard is when a higher standard of grooming is expected of women as opposed to men. This double standard has consequences that unfairly affect women because it means women often spend a lot more time working on their appearance than men do—time that could be better spent elsewhere. In suggestion 10, Adichie recalls how she spent a great many Saturdays of her childhood having her hair plaited simply because girls were expected to conform to an overly high ideal of “neatness”: “imagine if we had not spent so many Saturdays of our childhood and teenagehood doing our hair. What might we have learned? In what ways might we have grown? What did boys do on Saturdays?” (44).

Another common example of a double standard is when women are judged for possessing personality traits that a man wouldn’t be judged for. For example, women are often judged for being angry, loud, or ambitious, while in men, these qualities are expected or even lauded as positive traits. What’s more, even when women and men behave exactly the same way, women are often perceived to possess negative characteristics that men aren’t. This is commonly the case with women who hold positions of power; powerful women are perceived to be cold, stubborn, or ruthless, even while their male equivalents are not. This is a double standard because we hold powerful women to a higher standard than we do powerful men. Adichie addresses this concept in her discussion of powerful women:

We ask of powerful women, is she humble? Does she smile? Is she grateful enough? Does she have a domestic side? Questions we do not ask of powerful men, which shows that our discomfort is not with power itself, but with women. We judge powerful women more harshly than we judge powerful men (24-25).

Adichie highlights many more examples of double standards for men and women that are prevalent in Nigerian and western culture. She argues that if we are truly committed to female equality, we must be self-critical of our own attitudes to women. We must be ever vigilant that we never hold women to expectations that we wouldn’t also hold men to. When we judge women for something, we should ask ourselves: would I judge a man for the same thing? 

Female False Consciousness

A prevalent theme in the book is the idea that women are often complicit in reinforcing unfair gender dynamics that are harmful to them. Another way of putting this is to say that some women possess a “false consciousness” when it comes to their own situation. That means that they have internalized the mode of thinking that is responsible for keeping them in an oppressed position. People who possess a false consciousness may think and act in ways that go against their own interests.

Some women do this consciously, as when, for example, women who openly identify as anti-feminists embrace a subservient role to their male partner. As Adichie says “there are many women in the world who do not like other women” (58). Yet, Adichie is adamant that this in no way invalidates the claims of feminism. The fact that some women are opposed to feminism only highlights “the extent of the problem, the successful reach of patriarchy” (59).

Still other times, women can reinforce gender roles unintentionally, and this is a bigger problem. Even women who consciously avow feminism can end up entrenching sexist dynamics in the way they behave. For example, in suggestion 2, we encountered the idea that sometimes mothers actively limit the role of fathers in child-raising out of fear that the father won’t care for the child properly. This might be a well-intentioned concern, but the effect is that the father won’t ever learn how to parent, and the mother is stuck doing all the work. Sometimes women unintentionally promote gender roles in the things they say, too. For example, when mothers refer to fathers as “helpers” or as “babysitters,” they are upholding the idea that childcare is the mother’s responsibility.

All this emphasizes the fact that for anyone who is serious about advancing the goals of feminism, it is not enough just to avow feminism, you have to be self-aware and self-critical of the way you behave in the real world. You can speak and act in ways that reinforce sexist gender dynamics, or you can speak and act in ways that subvert sexist gender dynamics. It’s your choice.